Game of Thrones cast members gather, while a character’s name is revealed…maybe

Photo: Maisie Williams/Instagram

Photo: Maisie Williams/Instagram

The TV families that play together, stay together, right? I sure hope so.  Game of Thrones cast members are having fun on Instagram again when they’re in the same city, with the Stark kids sharing a few pics.

Sophie Turner and Maisie Williams, bringing the #Mophie:

#mophie

A post shared by Sophie Turner (@sophiet) on

Stark Family Time with Sophie, Maisie, and Isaac Hempstead Wright:

Brooooooos @sophiet @isaachwright

A post shared by Maisie Williams (@maisie_williams) on

Isaac shared this photo of Dean-Charles Chapman today. Looks like all the the cast’s young people are together this week:

Cheeky Nando's with the Dean @deancchapman

A post shared by Isaac Hempstead Wright (@isaachwright) on

Lastly, another cast member shared a photo- Thor Bjornsson and new season 6 cast member Jóhannes Haukur Jóhannesson posed together in Belfast yesterday. It’s not known yet which role Jóhannes is playing, but we’re guessing Riverlands outlaw based on a few things. Though in Belfast at the same time, they may not be shooting together. It’s nice to have a photo of the show’s Icelandic cast members together though!


Light spoiler discussion ahead!

One of the most exciting developments of Game of Thrones season 6 has been learning the show would be depicting, in some form, the Tower of Joy. The tower story in the novels is a memory connected to one of the central questions of GoT. The tower is a significant memory for Ned Stark, and what’s especially intriguing about the show dealing with this portion of Westeros history is that it likely means we’ll see a younger form of Ned.

We followed the shooting of the scene at Zafra Castle in Spain, and the casting info as it surfaced at the time. It appears that Luke Roberts, Eddie Eyre, and Robert Aramayo have been cast in roles for the scene. A WotW reader reported all three were rehearsing a fight scene together weeks before Aramayo or Roberts were announced or officially confirmed as cast.

That’s where it gets interesting. Eyre’s CV initially stated that he was playing Ser Alfred Hunrith…but there is no character by that name in ASOIAF.  There is a key character named Ser Arthur Dayne at the tower, but that’s as close as it gets.

And now Luke Roberts’ agency CV has been updated to reveal his role in Game of Thrones season 6. According to his resume, the actor is playing “Rowland Selwyn.”

There is no one by that name at the Tower of Joy in the novels. There was a man named Howland Reed, there with Ned Stark. “Selwyn” in ASOIAF is actually the first name of Brienne of Tarth’s father.

It appears that GoT has borrowed Selwyn’s name to create this new name (as I doubt this character has anything to do with Brienne). So is Roberts playing Howland Reed? Is the new name a permanent one or is it just a placeholder? GoT has never bothered with fake names on resumes before (not even for Iwan Rheon- “Boy” is all Ramsay was called by people in his scenes during his first season) but perhaps the show is doing so now.

At 6 feet tall, Roberts is hardly crannogman height but neither was Thomas Brodie Sangster at 5’10”.

Or Game of Thrones is just completely messing with us now when it comes to the fake names. We’ll find out in the spring.

Screencap of the puzzling CV entry:

Luke Roberts

174 responses

Jump to (and Always Support) the Bottom

    1. So Thor Bjornsson is what, 6’9? And the guy with him isn’t that much shorter. Is there a special kind of Scandinavian people who just grow to be enormous?

        Quote  Reply

    2. They’ve already namedropped Selwyn Tarth in Season 2 or 3, would be silly to use it as a surname now when there are so many others out there. They’ve also established that Howland Reed was with Ned during the Rebellion.

      I hope they don’t change any more names. Kinda pointless.

        Quote  Reply

    3. I’m also reading “Various” under directors… You’re telling me that the ToJ scene will be split in different episodes?!

      Or maybe, we’re getting Ashara’s suicide as well!

        Quote  Reply

    4. Mhysa7,

      You really can’t read much into that. I’ve seen “Various” under a lot of people’s Director slot and it’s usually because they didn’t know who the director was.

        Quote  Reply

    5. I still think that Robert Aramayo looks like Jojen, so if any of the ToJ cast (that we are aware of) is going to be Howland Reed, it will be him.

        Quote  Reply

    6. BeautyBrinne,
      Newbietothegame,

      I had my DNA tested a few years ago; aside from being 40+% Irish (no surprise), turns out I’m 28% Scandinavian. Which is interesting, as my dad is 6’6″, and I’m just shy of 6′ myself– and I’m a girl. I’ve known several other Scandinavian people over the years, and they were relatively taller as well, so there must be something in those ancient Viking genes. 😀

        Quote  Reply

    7. Oh now wouldn’t that be something? To have Selwyn Tarth as present at the ToJ.

      Not that I think it will happen, but what an interesting twist idea.

      They haven’t landed on an age for Brienne in the show, but in the books she’s 18-19. In the show, I’m assuming mid-20s, but looking older because of the ugly. Tarth seemed no where during Robert’s Rebellion, but it is part of the Stormlands.

      The whole idea, while most likely ridiculous, is really intriguing. So much more interesting than fire-proof v. fire-resistant or “agency!”

        Quote  Reply

    8. We rarely see Isaac hanging out with the girls, now that I think about it.

      “Various” director entries often get whittled down to just one director when more information is added.

        Quote  Reply

    9. Looking at the name etymology for both of these names, Rowland means “renowned throughout the land”, and Selwyn means, “friend in the castle”. Probably they just picked random names, though………………….

        Quote  Reply

    10. Maybe Luke Roberts is playing young Ned? He looks like David Wenham who played Faramir,younger brother to Sean Bean´s Boromir in LOTR…Ah!! I don´t really know 🙁

        Quote  Reply

    11. I am curious who filmed with who…. Maise did some scenes with BWB?
      Sansa?
      Maybe they shoot some kind of dream with Bran and his sisters?
      Any other actors there?

      I don’t think any regural viewer would remember how Brienne’s dad is called, and they even made his name a surname… so they can say this surname is from anywhere in Westeros….but i agree this must be a cover name.

        Quote  Reply

    12. Rowland = Howland!

      I can definitely see production making up fake “Westerosi” names for a sequence as important and spoilery as

      ToJ

        Quote  Reply

    13. ghost of winterfell,

      My first thought was that it looked kind of like Natalia Tena, but of course it could be anyone, including non-GoT actors. A parent, an agent, a crew member, a friend… who knows.

        Quote  Reply

    14. I wonder if they’re gonna mix Howland with Brienne’s daddy to have another angsty plot about dads, “the chosen/it’s fate” or something like that… Or to cut characters :/ I understand the point, but…

        Quote  Reply

    15. I’m sure these names are bogus. The TOJ scene is one of the most important ones in the series, so I’m sure they are doing everything they can to keep it under wraps.

        Quote  Reply

    16. The names for ToJ flashback actors are so obviously fake. Those scenes will already be a headache for the show when you consider the exposition necessary just to say who’s who; they won’t be adding new characters, much less houses.

      I’m staunchly in the Eyre/TheNed//Aramayo/Reed//Roberts/Dayne camp, with an extra/Buckets hope.

      Considering that this is potentially THE flashback of note, and that it may have spawned a huge in-story lie/fake name, it wouldn’t surprise me if fake names for this scene and this scene only were something of a production joke.

        Quote  Reply

    17. Of course these are fake names. Howland Reed has already been name dropped and mentioned as

      saving Ned’s life

      in the show. Arthur Dayne was also name dropped by Joffrey in season 4, and if you look at the close up of his page in the white book on the show, it is mentioned that he was

      killed in Dorne by a group led by Eddard Stark(It was either Dayne or Hightower’s page).

        Quote  Reply

    18. Lion of Night,

      I don’t really see the point, since only book readers would have any sense of the significance of those names, and they already know about that sequence.

      Maggie,

      I don’t imagine they’re filming together, just that they were all in town for work purposes.

        Quote  Reply

    19. Crap, that one handsome dude 😀
      That jaw line on Luke Roberts KINDA reminds me

      of how hard it is to be straight sometimes…. erm.. I mean

      Jojen’s

        Quote  Reply

    20. I tend to agree with the points made that these are likely names designed to throw us off the scent, although I don’t see the point as we all know what’s coming.

      On another note- I saw the Eddie Eyres Twitter account mentioned that he’s done with GoT “for now”. Wonder if he’s been told he’ll be back next season?

        Quote  Reply

    21. Sean C.,

      Whenever these actors were hired, I’m sure they hoped that all of the filming spoilers wouldn’t come out. Yes, we book readers know about the scene, but it is in the first book. I can absolutely see why they’d want to keep it secret now, as it basically confirms that Jon’s story isn’t over. You don’t actually believe that they changed Ned’s name to Alfred Hunrith? Or Arthur Dayne to Rowland Selwyn?

        Quote  Reply

    22. Kilgore Tully:
      The names for ToJ flashback actors are so obviously fake. Those scenes will already be a headache for the show when you consider the exposition necessary just to say who’s who; they won’t be adding new characters, much less houses.

      I’m staunchly in the Eyre/TheNed//Aramayo/Reed//Roberts/Dayne camp, with an extra/Buckets hope.

      Considering that this is potentially THE flashback of note, and that it may have spawned a huge in-story lie/fake name, it wouldn’t surprise me if fake names for this scene and this scene only were something of a production joke.

      Yep, this.

        Quote  Reply

    23. Tyrion Pimpslap,

      Yeah but you couldn’t pay 99.9999% of casual viewers to remember either of those references.

      But I am leaning more toward the totally-fake-just-for-now names. And who says they’ll have time for introducing anyone by name during these vague vision-flashbacks.

        Quote  Reply

    24. Sean C.,

      That is a valid point, but surely Ned Stark is a known name! Howland also already exists in the GoT universe, so it’s really just Dayne we should be discussing.

      Of course I can’t speak for what D&D will end up doing, however the question I usually end up asking myself is: Why add/change if an existing solution already exists? We can agree or disagree on the validity of changes in the show on a personal basis, but changes are generally made for some reason. All of this to say, if Dayne’s name is changed *most likely* there is a reason for it. But given his relevance to one of the major asoiaf twists, I’d air on assuming his name remains the same.

        Quote  Reply

    25. Lion of Night,

      Dayne was already named couple of times in the show.
      The one I clearly remenber is Joffrey and Jaime in S4. It wasn’t a disscussion about him, but Joffrey did say his name.
      So I think it’s preaty safe to say his name will be the same.

        Quote  Reply

    26. Tyrion Pimpslap,

      Totally forgot about that Dayne name drop! Thanks for the refresher.

      Sue the Fury,

      Agreed. I do think it usually makes sense to use already spoken names from a writing POV. I doubt casual viewers remember Benjen, but they also got the “last time on GoT” reference in 510 as a reminder. I suppose that was a case of a forgotten but useful character for motivating Jon to fall for the trap.

        Quote  Reply

    27. But stil clear that roberts is playing Dayne NOT Howland. Aramayo is Howland and Eyre is young Ned.

      This is just to confuses people.

      But as we know Howland is in the ToJ flashback, he will be in the show in the present to confirm jon parents. And i hope Ian mackshane is not Howland because he is nothing like Aramayo or jojen. I want him to be Meribald and tell the “broked man” and interact with the hound.

      🙂

        Quote  Reply

    28. Sue the Fury,

      It’s an interesting question, because truthfully while Arthur Dayne might be an intruiging character to some people in the books, particularly his sword, and his sister is a fairly obvious red herring…. he has literally one line of dialogue in ASoIaF and I believe she has none. I wouldn’t be terribly surprised if they just left the Kingsguard at the tower nameless. They play no continuing role or relevance that has been revealed, it’s more an interesting bit of trivia.

        Quote  Reply

    29. Shockmesane,

      They’ve already name dropped Arthur Dayne though. Talked about his nickname, talked about him with Jaime, talked about his accomplishments. Done in an invented scene not from the books too. So I don’t see the point of that scene if fast forward two seasons later when the time comes to actually use that character they make him nameless.

        Quote  Reply

    30. Mihnea,

      It’s not an honest mistake, he’s a low-grade troll. Same person who was tweaking about Emilia spelling defense/defence the British way. Not interested in having trolls stick around so bye, dude.

        Quote  Reply

    31. There’s no way Robert Aramayo is anyone but Howland Reed. He’s a dead ringer for Thomas Brodie-Sangster.

      And Luke Roberts has the whole dashing hero thing going on, so would be best suited to one of the Kingsguard I think, not a crannogman.

        Quote  Reply

    32. doug,

      I don’t know how much dialogue there will be during the Tower of Joy scenes, but I agree that they will surely establish the fact that one of the knights is Ser Arthur Dayne and that these are not just any old knights that Ned and co are fighting.

      To leave them nameless and see Ned and co being all but bested by a few random knights would be rather odd.

      They’ll have to make it obvious to the average viewer why Dayne and the other knights are such accomplished fighters and why they might be guarding the Tower of Joy, otherwise the scene surely wouldn’t carry the same weight that it will surely be intended to carry.

        Quote  Reply

    33. Mihnea,

      That was last Friday’s evening festivities 😉 I’m still missing a couple so if anyone has a lead, send them to me on twitter (@helencarnatenh) and I’ll make the update!

        Quote  Reply

    34. I love that they try to throw the fans by changing the name. I’d like to be a fly on the wall listening in to D&D trying to figure out how to hide the true names of certain characters.

      Also wow that is a lot of beard in one photo. And the beards get progressively smaller left to right! I think it’s great the cast hangs out off screen. Seems like a good bunch of people all around! Mophie is the best!

        Quote  Reply

    35. I wish they went all out with the fake names and made them openly ridiculous, instead of plausibly deniable. I would love to see a casting notice indicate that Luke Roberts will be playing the role of Lord William Clinton on Game of Thrones.

      If he is playing Arthur Dayne, I wonder how they’ll convey that information to the audience.

      Reed: Look! It’s Arthur Dayne!
      Ned: Who?
      Reed: Arthur Dayne? Of House Dayne of Starfall?
      Ned: Not ringing any bells…
      Reed: Kingsguard to King Aerys?
      Ned: Who’s that?
      Reed: Whom they call the Mad King?
      Ned: Aerys, right. THAT guy, I remember.
      Reed: The finest knight in the Seven Kingdoms?
      Ned: Ohhhhhh, Arthur DAYNE. Gotcha. Right…Well, we’re fucked.
      Reed: Pretty much.

        Quote  Reply

    36. Kilgore Tully: Those scenes will already be a headache for the show when you consider the exposition necessary just to say who’s who

      Is it necessary to say the names? In the end, does it matter what they are called or if they are addressed by name? It only matters that they are Kingsguard blocking Ned access to his sister. That is the what. The other important thing is the why. They could be Curly, Larry and Moe for all the effect it will have on the story or plot.

        Quote  Reply

    37. Sue the Fury: Yeah but you couldn’t pay 99.9999% of casual viewers to remember either of those references.

      Hmm, one in a million. What are the rates of eidetic memories?

      (I actually did not remember that those names were dropped: I probably catch it every year on my annual “binge” and promptly forget about it the next day.)

        Quote  Reply

    38. Fienix,

      Lot’s of Viking blood in Ireland particularly around cities that they founded or ruled at various times in history like Dublin and Limerick (both of which some of my ancestors came from). They say red hair is probably from the Vikings and my family definitely has that.

        Quote  Reply

    39. M:
      If he is playing Arthur Dayne, I wonder how they’ll convey that information to the audience.

      Reed: Look! It’s Arthur Dayne!
      Ned: Who?
      Reed: Arthur Dayne? Of House Dayne of Starfall?
      Ned: Not ringing any bells…

      I imagine Dayne will get a mention in a buildup to the fight scene, if we spend two scenes with young Ned and co. and not just jump into the fight.

      It will be a serious version of this, with Dayne as the focal point. One member of the group will be seriously nonplussed that Dayne is there, and another will quiet him down before he can recite all Dayne’s legendary achievements and skill.

      A much cheesier option would Bran and Bloodraven talking about things as they unfold.

        Quote  Reply

    40. jentario,

      I definitely see Ned in the strong, squared jawline of Aramayo, but I lose it around the eyes and nose. 95% certain that he is playing Howland Reed. I think Eddie Eyre is Arthur Dayne and I don’t care who Luke Roberts is playing as long as he doesn’t wear a helmet so we can see his pretty face!

        Quote  Reply

    41. OT: Looks like grantland.com will go offline. Damn, a season of GoT is not the same without Andy Greenwald’s recaps. Best unsullied reviewer out there

        Quote  Reply

    42. Dolorous Ned,

      I agree. Pretty sad. ESPN will rue the day! How could they not give more support to Grantland? So many talented sports & pop culture writers there, and most of them started jumping ship before today because they knew the end was nigh.

        Quote  Reply

    43. Dolorous Ned,

      Oh, man. That’s the worst. Andy wrote on twitter that he was planning on leaving Grantland next week anyway, though. Will miss his reviews and ‘Watch the Thrones.’

        Quote  Reply

    44. Felt Pelt: I imagine Dayne will get a mention in a buildup to the fight scene, if we spend two scenes with young Ned and co. and not just jump into the fight.

      It will be a serious version of this, with Dayne as the focal point. One member of the group will be seriously nonplussed that Dayne is there, and another will quiet him down before he can recite all Dayne’s legendary achievements and skill.

      A much cheesier option would Bran and Bloodraven talking about things as they unfold.

      I thought of Bran and Bloodraven acting as sports commentators briefing the audience on the big game. “And leading up the Kingsguard we have Arthur Dayne. Arthur Dayne’s been a real star player on the Kingsguard with a stellar record in the clutch and we can expect great things from him today. And over here we have Ned Stark who’s been doing great things this year with assists from Howland Reed…”

      I’m thinking now of the East/West Bowl skit from Key and Peele with the player introductions: “Arthur Dayne. Kingsguard.”

      …In all seriousness, I expect Bloodraven’s present in the scene to explain to Bran who’s who. “Who’s that?” “That’s Howland Reed.” “Jojen and Meera’s father?” “The same.” Blah blah blah.

        Quote  Reply

    45. Artur Dayne has already been named in the show when Joff talked with Jamie about how his acomplishments were lacking compared to other KG ….

      No reason to change HIS name …

      Howland Reed tough … maybe they WILL change his if they make him more of a fighter type character thean the anti-social nerdy lord he is in the books.

        Quote  Reply

    46. M:
      …In all seriousness, I expect Bloodraven’s present in the scene to explain to Bran who’s who. “Who’s that?” “That’s Howland Reed.” “Jojen and Meera’s father?” “The same.” Blah blah blah.

      I really hope if they speak, they speak in the cave, and then are just silent onlookers if we see them on the field. It just takes me out of the swordfight if there’s an numinous being standing in the background.

      Also I really hope these flashbacks let them dust off the Aerys the Mad King footage from the pilot.

        Quote  Reply

    47. Lisa0527:
      Anyone think we’ll see a Harrenhal flashback?

      Why? We don’t need to see a flashback for something we already heard the story for.

      thornofhighgarden:
      Dolorous Ned,

      Oh, man. That’s the worst. Andy wrote on twitter that he was planning on leaving Grantland next week anyway, though. Will miss his reviews and ‘Watch the Thrones.’

      Chris Ryan had already left, so we knew we probably weren’t getting any new GOT podcasts from Grantland weeks ago.

      My guess is that Greenwald will join Ryan at Bill Simmons’ new place at HBO, so we might still get them by next year. Fingers crossed.

        Quote  Reply

    48. Season 6 is the season of the Neds.

      Boy Ned
      Play Ned
      ToJ Ned
      ???

      What ever became of poor Ned’s bones? Did Cat and Brienne take them back to Robb?

      Will the Night’s King give us Vengeful Skeleton Ned at some point?

        Quote  Reply

    49. Luke roberts is Arthur Dayne, Eddie Eyre plays young Ned, this is old news. Check eddie’s hair on his twitter at the time and the leaked footage of toj.

        Quote  Reply

    50. Ore,

      It’s quite possible those are their roles. But hair length is pretty irrelevant when Roberts could be wearing a wig in his role, and Reed and Dayne could have any hair length.

      The leaked footage is very low quality from a distance, so that doesn’t help.

      Basically we need GoT or these guys to tell us who they’re playing.

        Quote  Reply

    51. FreeParking,

      But if they move to HBO they couldn’t review the show anymore because they would be accused of bias . I’m not saying they wouldn’t be impartial,but you know how stupid some people are on the internet .

        Quote  Reply

    52. Nymeria Warrior Queen,

      My pleasure! I added the photos last weekend and if anyone can think of other non-speculative info that would be helpful to reference please let me know. I keep it updated generally within about 12-24 hours of a casting post hitting here.

        Quote  Reply

    53. Fu Manchu,

      I question the need to include Meera and Jojen if there is no payoff with Howland (whether they change the nature of his character or not). Dear D&D… please don’t leave me hanging. <3 Angie

        Quote  Reply

    54. Anguissette1979:
      Nymeria Warrior Queen,

      My pleasure! I added the photos last weekend and if anyone can think of other non-speculative info that would be helpful to reference please let me know. I keep it updated generally within about 12-24 hours of a casting post hitting here.

      Fantastic work! Bookmarking for sure. Unless I missed it, I didn’t see the young stunner role on there that many people thought was

      Lyanna

        Quote  Reply

    55. Ragnar:
      FreeParking,

      But if they move to HBO they couldn’t review the show anymore because they would be accused of bias . I’m not saying they wouldn’t be impartial,but you know how stupid some people are on the internet .

      Yeah, I am not sure how that would work out, but it is our best bet.

        Quote  Reply

    56. Master of Boobs:
      Who burned Summerhall?

      We honestly don’t know yet.. We know that Aegon V died in the fire and I think that Dunk as Thick As A Castlewall also died there.. It’s probably the big ending to Martin’s D&E Novella’s.. If he ever intends on finishing them all.. (I think he had 9 or 12 in mind(?) and has done 3 so far, with Winds and Dreams taking priority)

        Quote  Reply

    57. Sue the Fury,

      Search on google images “Eddie-Eyrie-Emmy”, it should appear a photo of him holding an emmy among the first batch, if that’s not the living image of Ned I don’t know what it is, keep in mind that the hairstyle doesn’t suit him so it should be work related (under contract or something). And while the face is not recognizable in the ToJ footage, the hair is. I’m not so sure about Luke Roberts, but I’m more concerned about the fact that Arthur Dayne looks to be wielding two swords, and unless those are Balckfyre and Darksister I don’t see the point of scrapping Dawn and that cool piece of lore for no reason other than props convenience.

        Quote  Reply

    58. Aguero:

      But as we know Howland is in the ToJ flashback, he will be in the show in the present to confirm jon parents.

      I think it’s likely that Howland will reemerge in the present day, but it’s not a foregone conclusion that he will. Especially if his sole purpose is to reveal Jon’s parentage; the flashback will probably have already done that!

        Quote  Reply

    59. Aramayo – Young Howland Reed
      Eyre- Young Ned Stark
      Roberts – Arthur Dayne

      im Pretty sure about that.

      The thing i want so much to know is if the episodes will have more minutes. i can say season 6 is the one with most plots ever. Look at where every character is In right Now, and what we will have in season 6. ( i know some characters will no even appear where i put them, but was the last place they were in season 5) LOOK:

      BEYOND THE WALL: Bran – 3 eyed Raven – Meera – Hodor -Children of the forest

      BEYOND THE WALL: Night ´s King – White Walkers – The dead army

      CASTLE BLACK/WALL: Alisser Thorn – Olly – Melissandre – Davos – Edd – Jon Snow-Others?

      SOMEWHERE NORTH:Tormund – Wun Wun – Widlings

      THE NORTH FORESTS: Brienne – Podrick

      THE NORTH FORESTS: Sansa – Theon

      WINTERFELL: Roose Bolton – Ramsay Bolton – Fat Walda – Baby – Others?

      LAST HEARTH: Smaljon Umber – Rickon – Osha – Others?

      NORTH HOUSES: Karstark – Mormont – Reed – Others?

      THE TWINS?: Walder frey – Lothar Frey – Black Frey – Roslin Frey – Edmure Tully – Others? ( i think they will show the freys in the twins instead of just show they marching against riverrrun in episode 7-8)

      RIVERRRUN: Blackfish – Spton Meribald – Others? ( as the twins i think they will show riverrun and blackfish instead os just show riverrun being sieged by freys)

      SOMEWHERE: BWB – Others? Lsh?

      SOMEWHERE: The Hound – others?

      THE VALE: Yohn Royce – Robin Arryn -That old Lady – Others?

      IRONS ISLAND: Euron Greyjoy – Yara Greyjoy – Baelon greyjoy – Aeron Greyjoy – Others?

      KINGSLANDING: Cersei – Kevan – Tommen – Margaery – Loras -Olenna – Pycelle – Qyburn – The mountain – Highsparrow -Lancel – LitlleFinger – Others?

      HORN HILL: Randyl Tarly – Melessa Tarly – Dickon Tarly – Tala Tarly

      WAY TO OLDTOWN: Sam – Gylly – Baby – Others

      DORNE: Doran martell – Aeroh Hotah – Elarya – Sand snakes

      DORNE SHIP: Jaime – Myrcella – Bron – Trystane

      BRAVOS: Arya – Jaquen ´Haghar – That Girl – Actors Group – Others?

      MEEREN: Tyrion – Varys -Missandei – Greyworm – RedPriest – Others!

      ESSOS: Jorah – Darioo

      ESSOS: Dany – Dothrakis

      Not mention the ´´pets´´, and we dont know if Genndry, Benjen are coming back.

      I think every episode need 1 hour AT LEAST.

      🙂

        Quote  Reply

    60. Laura,

      I thought the young stunner was one of the non-leading actress theater ladies but I may have been wrong on that and not put “young stunner” back under uncast roles. I’ll find the original casting post and double check. Thanks for the heads up!

        Quote  Reply

    61. FreeParking,

      Yeah, Chris, Andy, Mallory and Jason did a great GoT podcast. I know Chris and Mallory already joined Simmons at HBO, but hope Andy and Jason land on their feet, too. I’m sure Andy will. He’s pretty sought after as pop culture writers go.

        Quote  Reply

    62. Lion of Night:
      Rowland = Howland!

      The weird thing is that they’re eye-rhymes but probably wouldn’t actually rhyme. Rowland is usually just an alternate spelling of Roland, whereas everyone I’ve heard refer to Howland Reed aloud has said it How-land.

        Quote  Reply

    63. Aguero,

      It looks like it. Howland saved Ned during Rebellion as Jojen said to Bran. Let’s hope they don’t change things.

      Howland Reed will be there to confirm Jon’s parents. Let’s say that Jon was the kid born at TOJ and not someone else. Still a theory not a fact. Who would believe him without any proof? Jon? Hardly. You would need some proof and I doubt that Howland is carrying any of it. A lot people speculate about somethnig hidden in Lyanna’s statue, but what could it be? Rhaegar’s harp is hardly any proof. They would need some documents, but that’s the first thing Ned would destroy leaving no trace behind.

        Quote  Reply

    64. Sue the Fury,

      who says they’ll have time for introducing anyone by name during these vague vision-flashbacks.

      Such a good point. It can be a character in the present telling the story of the flashback scenes at toj. It can only be Howland Reed. The only one left alive. Doh ! I can’t believe I didn’t realize this before. Unless it is a Bran Stark vision through weirnet. In both cases characters names don’t need to be introduced especially if it’s a dreamy kind of flashback as opposed to a cersei/frogmaggie flashback.

      Edit –> if it’s not a bran/weirnet flashback memory and if it’s a memory told by HReed himself then that explains why the actor could be signed in season 7 (he can be aged to play an older HR)

      Kilgore Tully,

      The names for ToJ flashback actors are so obviously fake. Those scenes will already be a headache for the show when you consider the exposition necessary just to say who’s who; they won’t be adding new characters, much less houses.

      Couldn’t agree more !

        Quote  Reply

    65. Hariette Tuttle,

      I always tought, and still think, that the audiance would be introduced to Dayne trough Jaime. Him telling someone about Dayne is my guess.
      That’s, in my opinion, how they will tell us how badass/awesome he is.

        Quote  Reply

    66. Lemme guess: Robert Aramayo is playing Edwin Kerfuffle.

      I seems very obvious: Arthur – Alfred, Rowland – Howland, Eddard – ??? (Edwin? 😉 ), then switch it around to not make it too obvious.
      So Ned = Alfred, Arthur = Rowland, Howland = ???

        Quote  Reply

    67. M,

      Don’t forget that we know that Bran and Bloodraven will be present for the ToJ scene.

      Honestly I think the only reason for this choice is that they will provide clarification to the viewer as to who and what exactly we’re seeing during the ToJ flashback

        Quote  Reply

    68. Hariette Tuttle,

      Vision or flashback can reveal it to the fans, but to convince some characters you’ll need more than that. I think that Ned would never leave any papers in case someone is sniffing around and questioning. It’s plausible that Lyanna asked him to keep it safe even from Jon himself for his own sake. Varys and his little birds, LF and who knows who else might be looking at this Ned Stark fathered a bastard. Many people were surprised by this, but since Ned and Cat were married not for a long time. He manage to get away with that.
      They might never bring Howland to the show in present time and let someone else explaining it to Jon and others. But then who that might be?

        Quote  Reply

    69. Geralt of Rivia,

      They might never bring Howland to the show in present time and let someone else explaining it to Jon and others. But then who that might be?

      Who else indeed ? I think there is a strong possibility that Howland Reed is brought to the show in the present time. Now interestingly, the question remains the same if he speaks out. Who would believe Howland Reed ? What’s his word worth in Westeros ? Even if he had papers from Lyanna or Rheagar thre would always be another player saying it’s a fake…

      Which brings us to another big picture question actually… what does GRRM has in store for the Jon Snow character ? His lineage might be revealed yes (we don’t know how or by whom) but it might never be acknowledged because of the reason you’re stating (it takes more than a flashback/memory) and also because this is a Game of Thrones : it would be unacceptable/ill-timed for a lot of players to legitimize Jon Snow/Stark/Targaryen. I’m not saying there won’t be supporters, just that it won’t necessarily be a game changer (I wish it were though, but that sounds unlike GrrM).

        Quote  Reply

    70. Geralt of Rivia: They would need some documents, but that’s the first thing Ned would destroy leaving no trace behind.

      I’m not sure what “documents” such a society would have! They probably did not bother with foot casts or stuff like that: and even if they had, then that’s for id’ing infants, not the subsequent adults.

      Ultimately, it is very possible that few people will actually accept that Jon is Rhaegar’s son. The big part will be for him to learn just what compromises of morality were done by Ned in order to safeguard him (Jon). Sometimes it is about protecting a realm, but sometimes it really is about protecting one little boy.

        Quote  Reply

    71. I can simply not imagine Howland starting to tell people that Jon is Rhaegars son. I simply can’t.

      What I always tought would happen, is that Howland will tell Jon in private/alone, more to tell him of his mother, then about Rhaegar.
      I was never one that belived this theory too have any political impact. I always tough this will have a impact only on Jon himself. More of a personal/intimate story/plot, rather then some political plot.

        Quote  Reply

    72. Cary Storm,

      The peanut will sleep a whole 12 hours now! 😀

      Sue the Fury,

      Added the Young Stunner back in and started to add filming dates to both cast and uncast roles, if known. Will work on that more tonight once said peanut goes back to sleep and I’m done handing out candy.

        Quote  Reply

    73. Wimsey,

      I meant some proof that Jon is legitimized and not just a bastard. I thought that he might be a bastard and still being a Targaryen bastard is relevant, but there is just some things suggest that he might not be a bastard. Rhaegar intended to change a few things in his last conversation with Jaime and who knows how far that goes. He possibly saw his daddy being a mad freak and wanted to put him out off IT or something else. Maybe it’s important only to convince Jon somehow and Daeny and rest will have to deal with it or there is some proof. But then I ask what that is?

      Who would want to believe that? Maybe Daeny because she desperately wants to find a family and that’s it. It might be just about them. His appearance is nothing like a Targaryen we meet and there is Daeny 100% looking Targaryen with army and three big dragons. Targaryen supporters would rally to her side.

      Hariette Tuttle,

      There is literally no one else to do it apart from Howland Reed. It’s interesting to think about it. There are still many answers even after the reveal. Who would believe him and what is it good for?
      It might be just about Jon or Daeny and to understand what Ned had to sacrifice for this to remain a secret as Wimsey said it. Ned said something in the books how he had to live 14 years in a lie and guess what. Jon was 14 years old. To find out about his mother and finally come to terms with this.

      Well, if Lyanna intended to stop Jon from knowing it. Ned on the crossroads said to Jon that next time they see each other, they will talk about his mother. Maybe it wasn’t what Lyanna asked him or Ned with that Jon joining NW would tell him that no matter what. He couldn’t be threat to IT anymore. NW is supposed to be neutral and NW would protect him for the rest of his life. Then I ask if Ned would send him there there even if it wasn’t his idea.

        Quote  Reply

    74. Didn’t the casting call for what we assume to be the Arthur Dayne character call for someone who was a master swordsman? Has anyone checked if any of these actors has that sort of background?

        Quote  Reply

    75. Geralt of Rivia,

      Yeah, I think it’s just about to whom it really matters that Jon is Targ. For one path to being king, it would indeed matter that many believe it (and have proof, perhaps). But I doubt that’s his story, anyway. It may be that it only matters to a few, for whom it can become evident in any number of ways. It might matter to Dany very much, and so the story just has to reveal it to her, not with a courtroom’s evidence, either. Mel can find out through her own means, and her support might be important. Bran is about to know, obviously, and he could let a couple other people that matter know.

      But this argument about how proof will get out to the masses is a bit misguided, I think.

        Quote  Reply

    76. Tyrion Pimpslap,

      Interesting. I just had to look at that scene from S4E01 again. While Joffrey reads the page about Sir Arthur Dayne you can see the page on the left about someone else who’s not named there. But it says he was dispatched by king Aerys to find Rhaegar and he died in the Red Mountains alongside his kingsguard brothers Arthur Dayne and Oswell Whent who were all killed by “a small force” led by Eddard Stark.

      So they basically gave the script for that scene already and kept the number and identity of men on Neds side ambiguous. I don’t think they will contradict what they established here, although it’s only something people know who go back and look at things on freeze frame.

        Quote  Reply

    77. Geralt of Rivia:
      Wimsey,

      I meant some proof that Jon is legitimized and not just a bastard. I thought that he might be a bastard and still being a Targaryen bastard is relevant, but there is just some things suggest that he might not be a bastard. Rhaegar intended to change a few things in his last conversation with Jaime and who knows how far that goes.

      Polygamy is not recognized in Westeros. The Targs only got away with it when they did because of dragons. Even if there was some document that could somehow prove that Rhaeagar and Lyanna married, the vast majority of lords and the Faith would not recognize it even if they did believe it, which itself is highly unlikely.

        Quote  Reply

    78. Geralt of Rivia,

      Ah, I see. Yes, if Rhaegar set aside Ellaria and legally married Lyanna, then there should be some “paper trail.” However, that trail might have been long-since destroyed, and any documents that could be produced could be accused of being forged. Look at what “Birthers” keep claiming about Barrack Obama’s birth certificate: if people do not want to accept what Jon is, then they will not.

      This is going to be a more general issue for Jon this season and in Winter. He’s now out of of the Night’s Watch, and the sentence for that is death. He cannot use the excuse of “I was dead, but I got better”: nobody would accept that.

      The parallel obviously is going to be with Daeny having to convince the Dothraki not to lock her up into Widow’s Purgatory. But Daeny has much more obvious means of “persuading” people than has Jon. I suspect that Arya might have something similar with the Faceless Men: if she strikes out on her own, then she might well be marked. (That could explain why the Waif is trying to kill her.) Tyrion has similar issues for having killed Tywin, once he ever returns. Bran might have difficulty convincing people that the voice in the trees is really him. The Winter story almost certainly is attached to this somehow.

        Quote  Reply

    79. FreeParking,

      If Daeny will believe in it and there is some document to convince her besides bonding with a dragon. Daeny in the books thinks that it was romantic rather than anything else. It’s not a stretch to think show Daeny might think the same. You know she has three dragons and might matter what she says and not so much what others might say. Dragons can be a pretty convincing argument.

      ghost of winterfell,

      That might do a trick.

        Quote  Reply

    80. Cock Merchant: But it says he was dispatched by king Aerys to find Rhaegar and he died in the Red Mountains alongside his kingsguard brothers Arthur Dayne and Oswell Whent who were all killed by “a small force” led by Eddard Stark.

      That is a very, very general synopsis that is consistent with what we know. Moreover, remember that this was written by someone who was not there: so, he could easily not know what really happened.

      And, of course, if you actually caught this, then I am impressed! There is no way that more than a tiny, tiny fraction of the audience bothered to pause those scenes and read the book. (In this case, I bet that they do remember: because only a hardcore would do that!)

        Quote  Reply

    81. Wimsey:
      Geralt of Rivia,

      He’s now out of of the Night’s Watch, and the sentence for that is death.He cannot use the excuse of “I was dead, but I got better”: nobody would accept that.

      You say that with such authority but the seed has been sewn for his release from those vows, “ended.” Word can get around. If some dude is released from his vows and rises from a raging pyre, that’s a good reason for word to spread. Besides, once NW is extinguished, there will doubly be no problem.

        Quote  Reply

    82. Geralt of Rivia,

      Dany’s dragons will not have time to reach Aegon’s dragons size. She will need something more to convince all the lords and the Faith, which has been gaining power, that polygamy is legitimate in Westeros. Honestly it is much easier if Dany thinks Jon is a Targ, that she just legitimizes him herself when she has the power.

        Quote  Reply

    83. Good to see that GRRM not only gets his 7th

      Ice and Fire Book published before the Zombie Apocalypse but also 800 pages of an 8th book.

        Quote  Reply

    84. Off-Topic Otto: If some dude is released from his vows and rises from a raging pyre, that’s a good reason for word to spread.

      Sure, the story would spread: and be dismissed just like grumpkins, Snarks and White Walkers. Turn that story on it’s head: why in the world would anybody think that it is true? Dead people do not rise from burning pyres alive and well: and therefore the story must be false.

      Again, this is why Jon is going to have a hard time convincing the Northerners that he’s not a deserter meriting execution: claiming that he was dead and therefore released from his vows might be the most clever lie that they’ve ever heard from a Night Watch deserter, but it’s obviously a lie because people do not come back from the dead.

      FreeParking: Honestly it is much easier if Dany thinks Jon is a Targ, that she just legitimizes him herself when she has the power.

      But why would she do that? Jon’s claim would come before hers given the rules of primogeniture. She would essentially be abdicating. The only way she might do it is if she weds Jon: but I have problems seeing that happening in some ways.

        Quote  Reply

    85. I’m really not sure Jon’s parentage will ever be revealed to Westeros at large, and maybe not even to him(although I think there’s a better than 50/50 chance he will find out). We(and Bran) will almost certainly find out via flashback, and for all we know that may be enough.

        Quote  Reply

    86. Wimsey,

      If Dany takes Westeros, she would be re-conquering it. Any rules that existed before aren’t going to matter because Dany can and will set her own. She will be Queen and if she legitimizes Jon then he would be her heir until she has children. She can also we’d him in order to combine their claims. Either way, her legitimizing him will not take her crown away.

        Quote  Reply

    87. El-Bobby:
      Wimsey,

      If Dany takes Westeros, she would be re-conquering it. Any rules that existed before aren’t going to matter because Dany can and will set her own. She will be Queen and if she legitimizes Jon then he would be her heir until she has children. She can also we’d him in order to combine their claims. Either way, her legitimizing him will not take her crown away.

      Besides, it wouldn’t matter anyway unless Jon pressed a claim against her. And if they’re allies, Jon wouldn’t do that because he’s Jon. It would be way out of character.

        Quote  Reply

    88. Please post some new news above this article?

      Know it hasn’t, but it feels like it’s been here forever for some weird reason every time I click on site and see that same b&w pic of Maisie ….

        Quote  Reply

    89. Damien,

      Last night was Halloween…..
      Sue & Co. get a pass for today in hopes they all went out and participated in some drunken revelry.
      Man, give them some time to recover!!!

        Quote  Reply

    90. El-Bobby: If Dany takes Westeros, she would be re-conquering it. Any rules that existed before aren’t going to matter because Dany can and will set her own.

      Daeny cannot set aside blatant sexism. If Jon is recognized as Rhaegar’s legitimate son, then there will rapidly grow a body of lords that would rather have him than her because they always will prefer “him” to “her.”

        Quote  Reply

    91. King in the North Carolina: not sure Jon’s parentage will ever be revealed to Westeros at large, and maybe not even to him(although I think there’s a better than 50/50 chance he will find out).

      Sometimes I wonder if Bran/BR will access Jon while his mind is in limboland and his body is recovering. Perhaps they escort his mind via the weirnet/greensight to the ToJ vision and he gets his parental info then, before he is “revived.” Maybe Mel is involved as well? In that case (and in most cases), the reveal will be entirely covert to Westeros and Jon may even doubt it himself. You gotta wonder how the news will spread and be accepted. I’m with Wimsey in that the national/international disbelief of a Stark/Targ biological liaison may be a story in and of itself.

        Quote  Reply

    92. Wimsey:
      But why would she do that?Jon’s claim would come before hers given the rules of primogeniture.She would essentially be abdicating.The only way she might do it is if she weds Jon: but I have problems seeing that happening in some ways.

      I neither said I wanted nor thought that would happen. I was discussing with people on how Jon Targ could be widely acceptable across Westeros. I don’t see a document or an item (a harp for instance) making everyone go “Oh, he is clearly Lyanna and Rhaegar’s legitimate kid.” Someone in power legitimizing him makes the most sense, if that is the direction the story goes. Frankly I don’t think Jon would want to be known as a Targaryen. He was raised a Stark, and Ned will always be his father to him.

        Quote  Reply

    93. King in the North Carolina,

      Jon will find out. GRRM said it. It’s absolutely necesarry for him to know, but it’s possible that large part of Westeros will not know it. But then how would Dany know about it and what if she doesn’t believe it? It’s possible. Unless Jon might bond with a dragon and that is questionable. Other than that not much an option.

        Quote  Reply

    94. Hodor’s Bastard: I’m with Wimsey in that the national/international disbelief of a Stark/Targ biological liaison may be a story in and of itself.

      GRRM and B&W both are big on parallels. I am betting that, somehow, the manner in which Jon convinces people that he’s not a deserter (= widow) and that he’s actually Ned Stark’s nephew (= Rhaegar’s sister not brother) is going to parallel what Daeny has to do to get Dothraki and Westerosi behind her.

      But I do think that we should not assume that Northern Lords are going to treat Jon bastard son of Ned or Jon ?bastard son of Rhaegar as the “victim” of the Night Watch rather than as a traitor to the Night Watch. Letting the Wildlings through the Wall will be treated by them in the same way that the NW treated it. And they will be even slower to accept that it is this, or give the White Walkers a massive Zombie army: the NW at least accept that there is some WW threat (although they obviously consider it to be much less than Jon and the Wildlings insist) whereas the Northerners will be very skeptical.

      And the Southerners will flat out reject it as “grumpkins and snarks.”

      FreeParking: He was raised a Stark, and Ned will always be his father to him.

      The big take-home lesson for Jon is that sometimes an individual has to greatly compromise his honor to save others, be it a kingdom or a little boy. (This is a lesson that Stannis could not learn, for what that is worth.) That might influence his decision regarding whether or not he is still a Man of the Watch.

        Quote  Reply

    95. FreeParking: I neither said I wanted nor thought that would happen. I was discussing with people on how Jon Targ could be widely acceptable across Westeros. I don’t see a document or an item (a harp for instance) making everyone go “Oh, he is clearly Lyanna and Rhaegar’s legitimate kid.” Someone in power legitimizing him makes the most sense, if that is the direction the story goes. Frankly I don’t think Jon would want to be known as a Targaryen. He was raised a Stark, and Ned will always be his father to him.

      I agree. In the books it will definitely be Robb’s Will that will solidify the north behind Jon, thanks to the efforts of Maege Mormont, Galbart Glover, Howland Reed and Wyman Manderly. Although I think Jon may relinquish his claim on the North once Sansa is revealed. And while Jon definitely views himself as a Stark, I mean his entire identity is tied to Ned Stark and his family, I wonder how his death and the subsequent visions/revelations will change him and the perception he has of himself. Will it lead him to make a claim on the IT, if for no other reason than to force the Kingdoms to unite and face the coming threat posed by the Others?

        Quote  Reply

    96. If there were ever a day appropriate to tinfoil-hat meditation, it’s today. All of you seem so sure now that Dany is going to rule Westeros. As much as I would love Dany to be shown as a wise, competent female ruler, I don’t think we are going to have to worry about it. This is my own humble opinion, based on my take of her visions, only on the show, during her trek through the House of the Undying and GRRM’s statements about the ending being bittersweet.

      She sees events that will happen in the future: She is shown going into the throne room of Kings Landing. The roof is burned and caved in, much like Harrenhall’s was shown to be, the result of dragon fire. Not wildfire, Cersei apparently doesn’t burn down the castle, or else the Iron Throne would be a melted heap and everything else would be ash. Snow is falling. Winter has come. Dany reaches to touch the throne – and does not. Her dragons call. She withdraws her hand (meaning she doesn’t take the throne) and goes through another door …

      …which turns out to be the north gate through the Wall at Castle Black. She walks through the snow …toward the light … to find Khal Drogo in his tent with their beautiful baby boy. It always mystified me why Drogo would be shown in the north, beyond the wall, surrounded by snow, when he could barely stomach the thought of sailing the sea.

      I think it’s because Dany answers the call of her dragons, goes north and dies beyond the wall, where she is then able to reunite with Drogo and the baby. In death.

      Bittersweet.

      Ok, have at it. Call me crazy. I call ’em as I see ’em.

        Quote  Reply

    97. Jeff O’Connor (JeffZero on some sites!): I like it. I like it a lot. Quite bittersweet

      Thanks. It really pained me to come to that conclusion. Upon rereading it, I would have changed one sentence as follows:

      …she answers the call of her dragons, and the call FOR her dragons.

      I think the situation in the North gets so desperate, that they implore her to come North to deal with the White Walkers. They know of her and her dragons, because they have heard what she did in Kings Landing. So much for answering your destiny and doing your duty.

        Quote  Reply

    98. Wimsey: …and that he’s actually Ned Stark’s nephew (= Rhaegar’s sister not brother)

      It took me too long trying to figure out how Jon was Rhaegar’s sister and not his brother…

        Quote  Reply

    99. Assuming someone does in fact end up ruling Westeros, I think Dany might legitimize Jon and make him her heir before she dies (after learning of his parentage), which also happens to tie in nicely with Thronetender’s theory.
      Of course I personally can’t see (and much less want) Jon ruling Westeros, but then his character is likely to undergo somewhat of a transformation anyway – so who knows. Unfortunately, I just can’t see Dany pulling through either.

      I guess the one thing this theory has going for it is that it neatly ties up several storylines and provides some poetic, bittersweet closure for the characters.

        Quote  Reply

    100. Anyone whose ancestry is ancient in northern Britian, Scotland and Ireland has a significant portion of Scandinavion blood in them. The “Vikings” invaded and either married or raped their way into the genetics countless times.
      Fienix,

        Quote  Reply

    101. Kosten: Dany might legitimize Jon and make him her heir before she dies (after learning of his parentage),

      Prophesy and HotU aside, how will Dany ever have enough advice and info on Jon’s “Targness” to make such a decision? She is in the same boat as all the other skeptics in Westeros, if not moreso. Perhaps the red princesses may provide some clarification? She thinks she is alone in the world. How will she be convinced?

      ——

      Thronetender, regarding the snow falling that Dany sees in her “dream”…perhaps, like Mel, she is confusing the “Snow” metaphor. Or maybe that snow is really falling in KL (and the fight has come to her as she arrives). In any case, I agree that once she arrives in Westeros, she may fatefully have to address all aspects of the “snow” metaphor before pursuing any aspirations of ruling Westeros.

        Quote  Reply

    102. Hodor’s Bastard: regarding the snow falling that Dany sees in her “dream”…perhaps, like Mel, she is confusing the “Snow” metaphor. Or maybe that snow is really falling in KL

      good point – hadn’t thought of that in terms of being the same as Melisandre always seeing snow or Snow. Hmmm … maybe that’s why she goes to touch the snow on the throne/her dragons call and she goes to the north? Don’t know, and we probably have 2 1/2 years before we know how it plays out. But I don’t think

      she makes it out of the story alive.

        Quote  Reply

    103. Thronetender,

      Yeah…we have to wonder what the casualty count will be before Sam and Bran discover and communicate the mysteries, misunderstandings and treaties of the past…. 🙂

        Quote  Reply

    104. Roger Sterling,

      I see that Watchers on The Wall has asked for more information on Twitter. I wonder if it’s true. Would they really film the wolves in Northern Ireland? Seems too dangerous and too difficult to get them there. How can you transport a pack of wolves? I’d expect them to film the wolves in their natural habitat or at a wolf sanctuary (or what is the right word in English?) and CGI them in the Riverlands.
      The wolves who play Ghost and Summer are also filmed somewhere else, and that’s only one wolf at the time.

        Quote  Reply

    105. Name *,

      Parallels, parallels!

      Michael: The “Vikings” invaded and either married or raped their way into the genetics countless times.

      As much as anything else, they colonized. They founded some English cities and all of the old Irish ones. (The Romans never made it to Ireland.)

      Selina: I don’t think the wolves are related to Riverrun filming. Lots of snow at Riverrun?

      There should be a lot of snow are Riverrun soon.

        Quote  Reply

    106. Hodor’s Bastard: Yeah…we have to wonder what the casualty count will be before Sam and Bran discover and communicate the mysteries, misunderstandings and treaties of the past

      Not quite sure what you mean by treaties of the past – is that a book thing? Or were you referring to things like Cersei’s agreement with Littlefinger based on him bringing her Sansa’s head? I’m just glad you included Sam. We sometimes forget the part that Sam can play in dredging up information.

      And yet, what would any treaty in Westeros matter if Dany comes over, and eventually meets the fate I think she’s going to meet?

        Quote  Reply

    107. Thronetender: Not quite sure what you mean by treaties of the past – is that a book thing?

      Yes, book stuff. According to ASoI&F legend, the Long Night/Battle for the Dawn ended after the First Men, AA, CotF, Giants and the Others came to a “violent agreement” that kept the WWs in the far north and enabled the wall to be built. This was all done without dragons in the mix. The rationale for the “treaty”, which may have been facilitated by the CotF, is the subject of endless debate, and may be the ultimate “truth” in this tale.

        Quote  Reply

    108. kit_hepburn: True, but they’ve been filming for two weeks there (maybe more) without it thus far.

      Most of it will get added after they do principle photography. Also, keep in mind that a season spans many months of time.

      Thronetender: Not quite sure what you mean by treaties of the past – is that a book thing? Or were you referring to things like Cersei’s agreement with Littlefinger based on him bringing her Sansa’s head? I’m just glad you included Sam. We sometimes forget the part that Sam can play in dredging up information.

      To follow up on HB, we have yet to learn what really happened all of those years ago. The Azor Ahai story (vague as it is) almost certainly is highly misleading, if not flatout false. Moreover, whatever R’hllor is telling its priests is almost certainly not to be trusted.

      I would look more at the Children than the Maesters for the answers. The Maesters came about long after this stuff happened: and both book & show indicate that they would be skeptical that there was any truth to these stories.

        Quote  Reply

    109. Agreed. History has many houses going extint. I think the Wildlings will fill the void like the Thanes are doing.

        Quote  Reply

    110. Am I the only one that sees that if you use all the letters in the names, Rowland Selwyn/Ser Alfred Hunrith it is an anagram that can spell either Arthur Dayne or Ser Howland Reed????????????

        Quote  Reply

    Jump to the Top

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *